CMP 30HX vs RTX 2050 Mobile for Blender
Compare CMP 30HX 6 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 7.4%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
7% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Most VRAM
CMP 30HX 6 GB
50% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
76% lower rating than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 765.06 | 821.41 +7% |
| CUDA cores | 1,408 | 2,048 +45% |
| Boost clock | 1785 MHz +43% | 1245 MHz |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 64 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 6 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM+50% | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s +200% | 112 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 192-bit +200% | 64-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 125 W | 30 W −76% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2021 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 30HX 6 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 12 runs
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB leads by 7.4% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (821 vs 765). CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB is the lower-power option at 30 W TDP, compared with 125 W for CMP 30HX 6 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 7.4%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 7% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Most VRAM: CMP 30HX 6 GB 50% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 76% lower rating than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.