RTX 2050 Mobile vs TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender
Compare RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB and TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. TITAN X (Pascal) leads the Blender benchmark score by 4.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
TITAN X (Pascal)
4% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Most VRAM
TITAN X (Pascal)
200% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
88% lower rating than TITAN X (Pascal)
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 821.41 | 854.08 +4% |
| CUDA cores | 2,048 | 3,584 +75% |
| Boost clock | 1245 MHz | 1531 MHz +23% |
| Tensor cores | 64 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM+200% |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 480.4 GB/s +329% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 384-bit +500% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX |
| TDP | 30 W −88% | 250 W |
| System PSU | N/A | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2016 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 15 runs
TITAN X (Pascal)
Blender 4.3.0 · OptiX · 30 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
TITAN X (Pascal) leads by 4.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (854 vs 821). RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB is the lower-power option at 30 W TDP, compared with 250 W for TITAN X (Pascal). If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
TITAN X (Pascal) leads the Blender benchmark score by 4.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: TITAN X (Pascal) 4% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Most VRAM: TITAN X (Pascal) 200% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 88% lower rating than TITAN X (Pascal).
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.