PRO W7900 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 7.6%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
8% faster than PRO W7900 48 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
200% more VRAM than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
76% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $1,626.91 Checked Oct 2, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 2.39 |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 | 3,894.44 +8% |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 4,352 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz +27% | 1957 MHz |
| RT cores | 96 +182% | 34 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 136 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +200% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 295 W | 70 W −76% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−58% |
| Release year | 2023 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 6 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB is faster for Blender rendering, but PRO W7900 48 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB leads by 7.6% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,894 vs 3,619). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB on RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB is the lower-power option at 70 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose PRO W7900 48 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 7.6%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB 8% faster than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 200% more VRAM than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB 76% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.