PRO W7900 vs RX 9070 XT for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RX 9070 XT for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 6.8%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
7% faster than RX 9070 XT
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
200% more VRAM than RX 9070 XT
Lowest power draw
PRO W7900 48 GB
3% lower rating than RX 9070 XT
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $799.28 Checked Oct 2, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 4.24 |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 +7% | 3,387.82 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz | 2970 MHz +19% |
| RT cores | 96 +50% | 64 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +35% | 640 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +50% | 256-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 4 |
| Render support | OpenCL | HIP |
| TDP | 295 W −3% | 304 W |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion−20% | 750 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Release year | 2023 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RX 9070 XT
Blender 5.2.0 · HIP · 309 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 6.8% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 3,388). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB on RX 9070 XT. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W7900 48 GB is the lower-power option at 295 W TDP, compared with 304 W for RX 9070 XT. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W7900 48 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 9070 XT is newer, but PRO W7900 48 GB still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 6.8%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 7% faster than RX 9070 XT.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 200% more VRAM than RX 9070 XT.
Lowest power draw: PRO W7900 48 GB 3% lower rating than RX 9070 XT.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while RX 9070 XT has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.