Back to GPU compare

RTX 3090 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation for Blender

Compare RTX 3090 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation for Blender rendering. See benchmark scores, VRAM, memory bandwidth, power draw, and estimated OptiX/CUDA render times side by side on Renderjuice. RTX 3090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 4.1%.

5,825.23
24 GB
2020
5,594.5
24 GB
2023

GPU 3

Fastest in Blender

RTX 3090 (5,825.23 score)

Lowest power draw

RTX 4500 Ada Generation (210 W TDP)

Spec
Performance
Blender benchmark score
5,825.23
5,594.5
-4%
CUDA cores
10,496
7,680
-27%
Boost clock
1.70 GHz
-34%
2580 MHz
RT cores
82 RT Cores (2nd Gen)
RT cores: 60
-27%
Tensor cores
328 Tensor Cores (3rd Gen)
Tensor cores: 240
-27%
Memory
VRAM
24 GB
24 GB
Memory bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
432 GB/s
-54%
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory bus
384-bit
192-bit
-50%
Memory speed
19.5 Gbps
N/A
Platform
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Render support
OptiX, CUDA
OptiX, CUDA
TDP
350 W
+67%
210 W
Release year
2020
2023

Benchmark comparison

Estimated seconds to render one frame of each standard Blender benchmark scene. Lower is faster.

seconds
Bars show single-frame benchmark estimates, not a full animation.
RTX 3090
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.

Quick take on RTX 3090 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation

RTX 3090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 4.1%.

Fastest in Blender: RTX 3090 5,825.23 score.

Lowest power draw: RTX 4500 Ada Generation 210 W TDP.

Both GPUs ship with 24 GB of VRAM, so the tradeoff is more about speed, architecture, and efficiency than memory capacity.

If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.

renderjuice

© Renderjuice 2026 All rights reserved.