RTX 4060 Ti vs RX 7900 GRE for Blender
Compare RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and RX 7900 GRE 16 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 9.7%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
10% faster than RX 7900 GRE 16 GB
Most VRAM
RX 7900 GRE 16 GB
100% more VRAM than RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
38% lower rating than RX 7900 GRE 16 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $599.99 Checked Oct 2, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 6.23 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,740.47 +10% | 3,409.28 |
| CUDA cores | 4,352 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 2535 MHz +13% | 2245 MHz |
| RT cores | 34 | 80 +135% |
| Tensor cores | 136 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+100% |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s +100% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 256-bit +100% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OpenCL |
| TDP | 160 W −38% | 260 W |
| System PSU | N/A | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2024 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 44 runs
RX 7900 GRE 16 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · HIP · 30 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is faster for Blender rendering, but RX 7900 GRE 16 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB leads by 9.7% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,740 vs 3,409). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RX 7900 GRE 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is the lower-power option at 160 W TDP, compared with 260 W for RX 7900 GRE 16 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose RX 7900 GRE 16 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 9.7%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 10% faster than RX 7900 GRE 16 GB.
Most VRAM: RX 7900 GRE 16 GB 100% more VRAM than RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 38% lower rating than RX 7900 GRE 16 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has 8 GB of VRAM, while RX 7900 GRE 16 GB has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.