RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation for Blender
Compare RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads the Blender benchmark score by 36.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
37% faster than RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Most VRAM
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
50% more VRAM than RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Lowest power draw
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
17% lower rating than RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $4,286.96 Checked Oct 2, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.82 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 7,782.52 | 10,655.29 +37% |
| CUDA cores | 12,800 | 18,176 +42% |
| Boost clock | 2550 MHz +2% | 2505 MHz |
| RT cores | 100 | 142 +42% |
| Tensor cores | 400 | 568 +42% |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+50% |
| Memory bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 960 GB/s +67% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 384-bit +50% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 250 W −17% | 300 W |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion−14% | 700 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2023 | 2022 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Blender 5.1.0 · OptiX · 8 runs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 20 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 36.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (10,655 vs 7,783). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 6000 Ada Generation has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 32 GB on RTX 5000 Ada Generation. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 300 W for RTX 6000 Ada Generation. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 5000 Ada Generation easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is newer, but RTX 6000 Ada Generation still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads the Blender benchmark score by 36.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 6000 Ada Generation 37% faster than RTX 5000 Ada Generation.
Most VRAM: RTX 6000 Ada Generation 50% more VRAM than RTX 5000 Ada Generation.
Lowest power draw: RTX 5000 Ada Generation 17% lower rating than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of VRAM, while RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.