RX 6600M vs TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender
Compare RX 6600M 8 GB and TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. TITAN X (Pascal) leads the Blender benchmark score by 2.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
TITAN X (Pascal)
2% faster than RX 6600M 8 GB
Most VRAM
TITAN X (Pascal)
50% more VRAM than RX 6600M 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RX 6600M 8 GB
60% lower rating than TITAN X (Pascal)
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 837.27 | 854.08 +2% |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 3,584 |
| Boost clock | 2416 MHz +58% | 1531 MHz |
| RT cores | 28 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM+50% |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 480.4 GB/s +114% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 384-bit +200% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX |
| TDP | 100 W −60% | 250 W |
| System PSU | N/A | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2016 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RX 6600M 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · HIP · 7 runs
TITAN X (Pascal)
Blender 4.3.0 · OptiX · 30 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
TITAN X (Pascal) is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
TITAN X (Pascal) leads by 2.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (854 vs 837). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
TITAN X (Pascal) has more scene headroom with 12 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 6600M 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RX 6600M 8 GB is the lower-power option at 100 W TDP, compared with 250 W for TITAN X (Pascal). If render speed is close, that can make RX 6600M 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 6600M 8 GB is newer, but TITAN X (Pascal) still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
TITAN X (Pascal) leads the Blender benchmark score by 2.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: TITAN X (Pascal) 2% faster than RX 6600M 8 GB.
Most VRAM: TITAN X (Pascal) 50% more VRAM than RX 6600M 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RX 6600M 8 GB 60% lower rating than TITAN X (Pascal).
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RX 6600M 8 GB has 8 GB of VRAM, while TITAN X (Pascal) has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.