Back to GPU compare

Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 5090 for Blender

Compare Quadro RTX 5000 and RTX 5090 for Blender rendering. See benchmark scores, VRAM, memory bandwidth, power draw, and estimated OptiX/CUDA render times side by side on Renderjuice. RTX 5090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 614.8%.

2,100.69
16 GB
2018
15,016.75
32 GB
2025

GPU 3

Fastest in Blender

RTX 5090 (15,016.75 score)

Most VRAM

RTX 5090 (32 GB)

Lowest power draw

Quadro RTX 5000 (230 W TDP)

Spec
Performance
Blender benchmark score
2,100.69
-86%
15,016.75
CUDA cores
3,072
-86%
21,760
Boost clock
1815 MHz
-25%
2407 MHz
RT cores
RT cores: 48
-72%
RT cores: 170
Tensor cores
Tensor cores: 384
-44%
Tensor cores: 680
Memory
VRAM
16 GB
-50%
32 GB
Memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
-75%
1,790 GB/s
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory bus
256-bit
-50%
512-bit
Platform
Architecture
Turing
Blackwell 2.0
Render support
OptiX, CUDA
OptiX, CUDA
TDP
230 W
575 W
+150%
Release year
2018
2025

Benchmark comparison

Estimated seconds to render one frame of each standard Blender benchmark scene. Lower is faster.

seconds
Bars show single-frame benchmark estimates, not a full animation.
Quadro RTX 5000
RTX 5090

These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.

Quick take on Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 5090

RTX 5090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 614.8%.

Fastest in Blender: RTX 5090 15,016.75 score.

Most VRAM: RTX 5090 32 GB.

Lowest power draw: Quadro RTX 5000 230 W TDP.

Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while RTX 5090 has 32 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.

If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.

renderjuice

© Renderjuice 2026 All rights reserved.