RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5000 for Blender
Compare RTX 4000 Ada Generation and RTX A5000 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads the Blender benchmark score by 6.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
7% faster than RTX A5000
Most VRAM
RTX A5000
20% more VRAM than RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Lowest power draw
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
43% lower rating than RTX A5000
Cheapest
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
43% cheaper than RTX A5000
Best value for money
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
87% better value than RTX A5000
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,685.22 Checked Oct 4, 2026 | $2,950.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 2.63 +87% | 1.41 |
| Blender benchmark score | 4,439.33 +7% | 4,166.59 |
| VRAM | 20 GB More headroom for complex scenes | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+20% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−45% | 550 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 6,144 | 8,192 +33% |
| Boost clock | 2175 MHz +28% | 1695 MHz |
| RT cores | 48 | 64 +33% |
| Tensor cores | 192 | 256 +33% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 768 GB/s +113% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 160-bit | 384-bit +140% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 130 W −43% | 230 W |
| Release year | 2023 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 5 runs
RTX A5000
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 9 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is faster for Blender rendering, but RTX A5000 has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 6.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (4,439 vs 4,167). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX A5000 has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 20 GB on RTX 4000 Ada Generation. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the lower-power option at 130 W TDP, compared with 230 W for RTX A5000. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 4000 Ada Generation easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose RTX A5000 would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads the Blender benchmark score by 6.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 4000 Ada Generation 7% faster than RTX A5000.
Most VRAM: RTX A5000 20% more VRAM than RTX 4000 Ada Generation.
Lowest power draw: RTX 4000 Ada Generation 43% lower rating than RTX A5000.
Cheapest: RTX 4000 Ada Generation 43% cheaper than RTX A5000.
Best value for money: RTX 4000 Ada Generation 87% better value than RTX A5000.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of VRAM, while RTX A5000 has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.