RTX 5090 D v2 vs TITAN Xp for Blender
Compare RTX 5090 D v2 and TITAN Xp for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 5090 D v2 leads the Blender benchmark score by 1480.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 5090 D v2
1,480% faster than TITAN Xp
Most VRAM
RTX 5090 D v2
100% more VRAM than TITAN Xp
Lowest power draw
TITAN Xp
57% lower rating than RTX 5090 D v2
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | RTX 5090 D v2 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 14,897.98 +1,480% | 942.86 |
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+100% | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 950 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion−37% |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 21,760 +467% | 3,840 |
| Boost clock | 2407 MHz +52% | 1582 MHz |
| RT cores | 170 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 680 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 1,340 GB/s +145% | 547.6 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR5X |
| Memory bus | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 575 W | 250 W −57% |
| Release year | 2025 | 2017 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RTX 5090 D v2
Blender 5.1.0 · OptiX · 10 runs
TITAN Xp
Blender 4.2.0 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 5090 D v2 is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 5090 D v2 leads by 1480.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (14,898 vs 943). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 5090 D v2 has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB on TITAN Xp. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
TITAN Xp is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 575 W for RTX 5090 D v2. If render speed is close, that can make TITAN Xp easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 5090 D v2 is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN Xp would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 5090 D v2 leads the Blender benchmark score by 1480.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 5090 D v2 1,480% faster than TITAN Xp.
Most VRAM: RTX 5090 D v2 100% more VRAM than TITAN Xp.
Lowest power draw: TITAN Xp 57% lower rating than RTX 5090 D v2.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 5090 D v2 has 24 GB of VRAM, while TITAN Xp has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.