Back to GPU compare

Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 5090 for Blender

Compare Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 5090 for Blender rendering. See benchmark scores, VRAM, memory bandwidth, power draw, and estimated OptiX/CUDA render times side by side on Renderjuice. RTX 5090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 592.6%.

2,168.17
8 GB
2018
15,016.75
32 GB
2025

GPU 3

Fastest in Blender

RTX 5090 (15,016.75 score)

Most VRAM

RTX 5090 (32 GB)

Lowest power draw

Quadro RTX 4000 (160 W TDP)

Spec
Performance
Blender benchmark score
2,168.17
-86%
15,016.75
CUDA cores
2,304
-89%
21,760
Boost clock
1545 MHz
-36%
2407 MHz
RT cores
RT cores: 36
-79%
RT cores: 170
Tensor cores
Tensor cores: 288
-58%
Tensor cores: 680
Memory
VRAM
8 GB
-75%
32 GB
Memory bandwidth
416 GB/s
-77%
1,790 GB/s
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory bus
256-bit
-50%
512-bit
Platform
Architecture
Turing
Blackwell 2.0
Render support
OptiX, CUDA
OptiX, CUDA
TDP
160 W
575 W
+259%
Release year
2018
2025

Benchmark comparison

Estimated seconds to render one frame of each standard Blender benchmark scene. Lower is faster.

seconds
Bars show single-frame benchmark estimates, not a full animation.
Quadro RTX 4000
RTX 5090

These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.

Quick take on Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 5090

RTX 5090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 592.6%.

Fastest in Blender: RTX 5090 15,016.75 score.

Most VRAM: RTX 5090 32 GB.

Lowest power draw: Quadro RTX 4000 160 W TDP.

Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while RTX 5090 has 32 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.

If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.

renderjuice

© Renderjuice 2026 All rights reserved.