Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 3090 for Blender
Compare Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 3090 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 3090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 167.2%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 3090
167% faster than Quadro RTX 4000
Most VRAM
RTX 3090
200% more VRAM than Quadro RTX 4000
Lowest power draw
Quadro RTX 4000
54% lower rating than RTX 3090
Cheapest
Quadro RTX 4000
87% cheaper than RTX 3090
Best value for money
Quadro RTX 4000
186% better value than RTX 3090
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $258.20 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $1,969.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 7.39 +186% | 2.59 |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,907.85 | 5,096.96 +167% |
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion−40% | 750 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 2,304 | 10,496 +356% |
| Boost clock | 1545 MHz | 1.70 GHz +10% |
| RT cores | 36 | 82 +128% |
| Tensor cores | 288 | 328 +14% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 416 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s +125% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 384-bit +50% |
| Memory speed | N/A | 19.5 Gbps |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 160 W −54% | 350 W |
| Release year | 2018 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
Quadro RTX 4000
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
RTX 3090
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 85 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 3090 is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 3090 leads by 167.2% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (5,097 vs 1,908). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 3090 has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on Quadro RTX 4000. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
Quadro RTX 4000 is the lower-power option at 160 W TDP, compared with 350 W for RTX 3090. If render speed is close, that can make Quadro RTX 4000 easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 3090 is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose Quadro RTX 4000 would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 3090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 167.2%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 3090 167% faster than Quadro RTX 4000.
Most VRAM: RTX 3090 200% more VRAM than Quadro RTX 4000.
Lowest power draw: Quadro RTX 4000 54% lower rating than RTX 3090.
Cheapest: Quadro RTX 4000 87% cheaper than RTX 3090.
Best value for money: Quadro RTX 4000 186% better value than RTX 3090.
Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while RTX 3090 has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.